|
Arrow
F.O.C.

FOC stands for Forward of Center balance point. This measurement
results from the relative weights of the components used in the arrow:
shaft, insert, head, Fletching and nock. A properly blanced measurements
of 7 to 10% There's an archery term that's used to describe an arrow's
balance point. It's called Forward of Center, or FOC. You arrive at FOC
by making a few measurements and then running the numbers through a simple
formula. Here's the process:
Overall length: Measure
the total length of the arrow from the nock groove to the tip of the arrow with the point you plan on using.
Balance point: Install the tip you will
be shooting. If you are testing stability for 3-D shooting put your field
point or nibb into the arrow. Of course, for hunting install your broadhead.
Find the arrow's balance point by sliding it back and forth along a fairly
sharp edge. You'll find the spot where the arrow just balances. Mark it
carefully. Now measure from the point of the arrow to the balance point
and enter the distan ce above.
Determine FOC: To find the FOC (which is
always expressed as a percentage) divide the overall length by two. This
should produce the physical center of the shaft. Now subtract this number
from the balance point and divide by the overall length. Multiply by 100
to express the fractional value as a percentage.
If you've ever played a friendly game of darts, you've
surely noticed that the dart is designed so that it's heavy in the front,
and light in the back. If the dart were weighted the opposite way, with
the tail being heavier than the tip, it would literally spin around and
hit the target tail-first. Obviously the ballistics of a dart and an arrow
are a bit different, but the underlying concept is similar. A projectile's
flight is most stable when most of the projectile's mass is positioned
Front of Center (FOC). As such, an arrow should be heavier in the front
than in the back. But how much? Where's the "perfect" balance
point?
This is another hotly debated issue among archery enthusiasts.
Some claim that FOC makes little or no difference, others swear that FOC
has a profound effect on accuracy. Even the industry experts don't seem
to agree, as the ballistic physics for FOC include some rather elastic
variables that make finding an "mathematically optimal" FOC
very difficult to declare and prove. To make matters worse, we even see
a variation in how FOC itself is calculated, depending upon which "expert"
you ask. So while we have no interest in the fine points of the debate,
we will agree that the tricky issue of FOC is at least worth considering
when purchasing a new set of arrows.
With all that said, it is generally believed that an arrow
with a high FOC will fly well, but with premature loss of trajectory (nose-diving).
While an arrow with a low FOC will hold it's trajectory better, but it
will fly erratically. So again, another trade-off for you to consider.
What am I looking for? While there doesn't
seem to be a magic number to aim for, it is generally agreed that the
optimal FOC balance for an arrow is somewhere between 7% and 15%. In the
example on the above, the 30" long arrow has balance point that is
3" forward of the arrow's actual center (15"). So it's FOC is
3/30 or 10% - a reasonable FOC balance.
|